Choose the workflow
Identify one consequential decision or action, who reviews its evidence and what becomes difficult when systems or suppliers change.
Secoya One
Start with one consequential workflow.
Scoped paid institutional pilots for independently checkable decision evidence.
Retail lending is the initial focus. We agree the evidence to capture, the integration approach and the criteria for assessing the result.
Discuss a pilotDefine the work before it begins.
Agree the integration
Map the evidence events, permitted data, responsibilities and institutional controls. Define record retention and approved verification material.
Assess the result
Agree acceptance criteria and a baseline for evidence capture, verification, integration effort and review effort.
Alongside existing applications.
Explore API, webhook and sidecar integration approaches and their technical scope.
Customer-specific connectors, key custody and operational controls are deployment work. Pilot and deployment pricing is scoped to each institution’s requirements, integration complexity and rollout scale. Commercial terms and schedule are agreed with each institution.
A clear contribution on each side.
The institution brings a bounded workflow, a named business or technical contact, relevant policies and permission to use agreed synthetic or appropriately authorised data. No customer records are needed for an initial discussion.
Secoya and the institution define evidence mapping, capture requirements, verification policy and assessment criteria together. Proposed measurements are not claims of completed pilot outcomes.
Secoya helps verify recorded evidence. It does not determine whether the original decision was correct.
Discuss your workflow.
Share the workflow, its reviewers and the evidence challenge. Technical reviewers can inspect the existing material before scoping integration.