Keep control
Your organisation retains its records and governs who can sign and verify them.
Secoya OneYour systems change.
Your systems change.
Your evidence should remain verifiable.
Secoya One helps organisations retain decision records they can check independently of the system or supplier that created them.
When a decision is challenged, the record matters.
A customer complaint, audit or supplier change can send teams searching across old systems for evidence. Secoya One is designed to make retained records independently checkable.
It is horizontal evidence infrastructure for consequential digital decisions and actions. The Secoya Trust Record is the retained artifact: a record of selected evidence that can be checked later.
Evidence your organisation can retain.
Check for changes
Determine whether protected information has been altered since it was signed.
Reduce dependence on the original system
Verify retained evidence using the required records and approved verification material.
Institutional custody is the deployment model. Each pilot defines how records, signing authority and verification material will be managed. Retention requirements are part of that scope, so future reviewers know which records and supporting material they need to keep.
See the record—and how it is checked.
A synthetic illustration of decision evidence, not footage of a bank deployment or Sandbox execution.
Technical evidence, ready for review.
Documented technical testing covers record integrity, verification and trust-policy checks. Technical material is available for review.
Secoya helps verify recorded evidence. It does not determine whether the original decision was correct.
Start with one consequential workflow.
We are engaging institutions for scoped paid pilots, with retail lending as the initial focus. Each pilot defines the evidence to capture, the integration approach and the criteria for assessing the result.
Retail lending is the current sandbox validation and initial pilot focus. It does not define the whole product category.
Tell us the workflow, who needs to review its evidence, and what becomes difficult when systems or suppliers change. We will use that context to scope the work and agree responsibilities and assessment criteria.